Find a Lawyer

GUL FARAZ KHAN versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, REGISTRATION

Regarding appointment to the Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 Government Employees (Applications for Services and Letters) Rules, 1966, R6 Resignation Impact, the appellant, before his resignation, was told that the department benefited from his services. Refused to lift. After his resignation, he disconnected all his contacts with his department and joined a provincial department, but a year later he decided to quit his job in the provincial department and appoint him in his parents' department. The request was made and after selection by the selection committee of the department. The appellant represented the Director General's representative to count his former services in the department and to fix the seniority to which he was entitled, before the departure of the department the applicant's application was withheld and He was obliged to obtain employment through employment. After separating all contact with his parents directly in the relevant application, the Appellant did not protest that he was a temporary employee and on his request under the Government Employees (Request for Services and Letters) Rules, 1966. Can't be stopped when the appellant did not benefit from the opportunity when he was told by them. The parent department that if he wants to get a job in the provincial department should resign, the appellant's appeal also suffered severe legal weakness as he failed to lead all the officials whose appeal for sanity. The seniority will be badly affected by the claims of the developer. It was accepted that the appellant rejoined his parent's field top advocates from Abbaspur lawyer