MUHAMMAD ACHAR versus CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
Sindh Government Employees (Efficiency and Forfeiture) Rules 1973 Rr 4, 5 & 6 Sindh Service \ Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Termination of charges of misconduct of a Section 4 Government employee when the public servant was in charge, the forest was severely damaged. ? The justification for the involvement of public servants in acts of forest damage can be justified, but the public servant was punished, however, it is hard to believe the fact that he is the only government punishment Was not responsible for any loss / damage caused. Employment must end retirement justice Just as government employee's dismissal was imposed by compulsory retirement, the appeal of a public servant was dismissed as amending his sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer
