Find a Lawyer

S.A. MUKARRAM versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND

Sindh Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 RR 4, 5 and 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4, Employment dismissed for misconduct Only the presence of a public servant is illegal. As was the time to discuss tranquility. In the Court of Appeal, the dismissal of the job was changed from a mandatory retirement from the job to the charges available against the public servant on the record, the evidentiary evidence was much weaker than that which could have led to the Department of Inquiry. During the period, the government employee was neither provided with a copy of the inquiry report nor was he given a show cause notice before the Supreme Court order was approved in the case of Syed Mir Muhammad Supreme. Because in PL 171 SC 176.1, submitting inquiry report and issuing showcase Or gone The notice was necessary not only on the principle of natural justice but also under the rules of competence and discipline, so it would apply in full force to the failure of the prosecution to prosecute the public servant for the above-mentioned legal damages. The appeal of the given public servant was accepted but his case was not free in any way; Was losing his job jobs for fresh advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer