DR. NADIR ALI KHAN versus THE DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES, HYDERABAD
Sindh Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 RR 4, 5 and 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Discharge for employment, disobedience of transfer order I admitted that it was after he relinquished his previous responsibilities that he was reporting duty to his superiors, that he was pursuing his offers against his transfer orders that were submitted by government employees. The representation made should have been answered by the responsible before it would be included. Holding was revoked at its new posting location, authorities were not obliged by any law or regulation to respond to every representative given by public servants, if government employees ordered their exchange Would have considered it profitable, he should have challenged it accordingly. Charges for disobeying transfer order against public servant with default procedure proved, his appeal against conviction was rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Mehar lawyer