FIDA HUSSAIN versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HYDERABAD
Appellant's dismissal on the charge of mismanagement of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 was to protect the lockup, from which a prisoner escaped while on duty and action was taken against his guard commander. This resulted in the reinstatement and removal of the guard commander. Appellant had a claim to re-enter service because of Appellant's own Guard Commander restoration because the Guard Commander's case was unusual when he was under the command of the Guard, while Lockup was in general charge. Was specifically assigned to. The duty of guarding the lockup as a secretary, even if the guard commander was equally responsible and reproducing his service was wrong, the appellant could not avail himself of such misconduct and was present at the excuse and service. There may be two errors. A right
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer
