Find a Lawyer

YASAR IMRAN versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) of the evidence was referred to the five accused in the FIR, while only one injury was levied on the accused person, who was specially convicted and another co-accused in large numbers. Although the accused was charged with armed with firearms, he was not charged with injury or aggravated assault with a firearm. It was alleged that they, along with the suspect, grabbed the victim with his legs and arms and threw him to the ground, but there was no obstruction or post-mortem inspection reports on the deceased's dead body. Conflict allegations also did not affect the recovery of any fireworks from the accused, who was declared innocent by the police, whose statement was never challenged by the complainant until the State Council also supported the prosecution. The version was of questionable nature against the accused, his conviction and sentence were set aside jobs for advocates from Multan lawyer