SADAR DIN versus STATE
Sections 393/34, 337F (iii) / 34 and 353/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (b) Applicability of the evidence did not challenge the conviction or punishment of the offenders and it was only prayer. The sentence was that all sentences could be ordered to run the prison only when the incident took place about three years ago and their arrest could have been terminated when the accused were in custody and they could be granted bail at any stage. Was not admitted to the trial court's direction for sentencing. Section 3353, the PPC, was not based on any particular reason for the defendants to run concurrently with the other convictions that it was alleged that he had committed all crimes in the Long Transaction and if he had been convicted of all crimes. If all the prisoners were approved, it was fair and just. It was ordered to run concurrently accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Charsada lawyer