Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAHIMYAR KHAN

OI, R10 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Enforcement of constitutional application suit for specific performance of the contract During the trial, after the parties have been removed Reached the terms of the agreement and the agreement. The Punjab and the Commissioners of the province were removed from the ranks of the defendants. During the execution proceedings, the defendants resigned on the request under Section 12 (2) CPC, following their decision. The case was reinstated after which the petition was moved under the OI. , R 10 CPC filed a petition before the trial court with the petition of the Punjab and the Commissioner as the plaintiff in the trial case and the appellate court of review filed the order of the trial court. Heard the petition filed against The constitutional petition against the constitutional order states that in the case of the statement of the counsel of the plaintiffs after the removal of the Punjab and the Commissioner from the ranks of the D, they could not demand a subsequent transfer because of their words. Earlier, the plaintiff had only made a statement to the Punjab and the Commissioner to exclude the defendant from the plaintiff's row. There was a compromise between the parties, with no compromise, and it was said that after the virtues of the judgment already settled, the principles of stoppage would not apply to the trial. , The application was allowed to favor the plaintiff. , The permission of the Punjab and the Commissioner to be included as a party, under whose jurisdiction the appellate court exercises us immigration advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer