Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SHABBIR versus STATE

The testimony of Sections 302 (b), 324 and 148 of the testimony could not have existed on the occasion of the threat to the life of the witness, since the firing between the two parties was unrelated. The matter was not reported when exchanged. The police station was also reported in a basement where the section HO was present at every opportunity as the FI rupees were filed after deliberations. Both sides continued firing at each other for ten minutes. The crime was not recovered. The forensic science laboratory was neither sent to the spot nor the recovered arms, so could not be used against the accused on rehabilitation charges. According to the investigation, it was suspected that the victim's death was due to the shooting of the principal accused. He didn't belong. The defendants' motive for the incident, based on suspicion established by the parties and the FIR, was not proved by any independent evidence. The prosecution's case was not free. famous lower court advocate from Talagang lawyer