Find a Lawyer

IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH versus AKHTARI BEGUM

Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Exceeding the appeal filed in the Supreme Court, the reasons for the delayed concession due to the delay in the petition for delayed cancellation. not provided. 2 8 1986 was appealed while 20 11 1986 was appealed The appellants claimed ignorance of the High Court verdict due to the fact that the verdict in the summer holidays was unaware of the announcement of the High Court verdict. Will not be justified because when the decision is to be announced, a copy of the cause list is always sent to the Advocate who is a lawyer in this particular case. Appellant's position that after the copies were available, he appeared in court without wasting a single day. True because the appeal for leave of appeal was filed on 20 11 1986, while the copies themselves were made available on 5 11 1986 as claimed by the appellant. I had no explanation famous supreme court advocate from Tarmatan lawyer