Find a Lawyer

ALLAH RAKHI versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Para 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Withdrawal of Rural Property Allotment Two persons were found in possession of separate part of the 'M \ and `A building of the M occupation of the M the. That was under his control. The settlement scheme was in the possession of the NO VIIl section ortion, `A of ', however, it was not allotted but was eventually allotted to the \ M section to which it had been allotted since 1952 because of its legality. There were three reasons for the record to be made on the basis of the transfer in favor of the section M section favor (i) any part of the property in favor of the `M favor 'in the transfer order, other than` A to' or `M than. Moving did not take effect. (ii) When the issue of transfer of the rest is taken up, the 'M' section finds its original allotment. And (iii) a close relationship between the \ M section \ and the status of the 'A position' was found, so the appeal was held as a member of the `M section the family 'appeal to any of the above facts. The leave to do so was denied either wrong or wrong family advocate from Jhand lawyer