SHAKOOR AHMAD versus STATE
Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Bail, Grant inquiry officer for further inquiry, evidence of the negligence of the Scope incident was attempted to turn this story on the complainant. The investigating officer concluded that the accused was responsible for shooting the victim, and that he was also accidentally seconded to Waldie Prima, a mistake by the FIR suspect in which the defendant and the injured prosecutor testified. Injuries and the Section 230 PP PPC petition required further police feedback, although not the court's obligation, but at the same time keeping in view the relevant circumstances when deciding on a bail application. The statement confirmed this. As stated in the FIR, whether this question was disclosed or accidentally killed by the accused due to a motion of motion, it will be determined after the trial when the accused in the circumstances of the bail. Be allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sakrand lawyer