INSTISAR ALI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 199 Constitution Petition Maintenance Order The applicant was employed in the Pak Air Force without any jurisdiction and was dismissed on the basis that he was involved in a murder case, the petitioner complained that he was acquitted of the charge. Has, therefore, been reinstated. The objection was raised by the authorities that the High Court could not issue writ in view of the provision of Article 199 (3) of the Constitution and the applicant could not be restored under Air Headquarters policy which was refused to be restored. The quorum was non-judgmental but did not disclose that the matter was considered in accordance with the directions of the concerned authority that the applicant's prima facie case required consideration of guidelines that were not made by the authorities in the constitutional clause. Under the jurisdiction of the courts could never be removed and always was. Available in the case of proceedings, proceedings or orders which were, without any reason, the High Court, setting aside the Eudis Order refusing to reinstate the applicant by the High Court, as it was without legal proceedings. And the High Court sought the appeal / representation of the applicants for strict consideration in accordance with the relevant policy provisions. The letter was allowed in accordance with the petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Bhuawana lawyer