Find a Lawyer

AKMAL PERVAIZ ALIAS PAIJI versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 Definition of Evidence The specific role of the FIR and the probable cause of the motion were given in detail in the FIR immediately listed by the two accused, and witnesses identified them in this case. By the prosecutor to whom the accused were asking. There was no purpose of the tax evasion from the complainant and other witnesses who filed the case, that both the accused were wrongfully charged with the trial court and that both the accused were liable for the legality of Section 302 (b) PPC. Sentenced to life imprisonment for being the real brother of the victim, he will not allow the actual culprit to be released. In such cases, the change was unusual, when it was admitted that there was no enmity between the accused or the other body with the victim or the complainant but the recovery of the weapon of crime would not be related in the presence of a credible account. Still recovering Kalashnikov from an accused. The case, which was found to be married to vacancies and the recovery of a 7mm rifle was also effective, at the behest of the other accused, the two accused were dismissed with responsibility for being released and the same case. I was proved by the prosecution's evidence that their conviction was proven by the High Court refusing to hear the two accused and to intervene in the sentence. The trial court's appeal was dismissed in the circumstances tax advocates from Mangowal lawyer