Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ ALI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, S&GAD, LAHORE

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4, 199 and 212 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 24 Applicants in constitutional petition in deciding representation of public squad whose decision to represent is not decided despite considerable delay. Was claimed, he claimed. It was the duty and responsibility of the public officials to decide on the representation of their subordinates without any fear, right or wrong, and, within a reasonable time, considered under Article 4 of the Constitution, Section 24A of the General Clause Act, 1897 The state's advice was studied with. It was submitted that the constitutional petition is not enforceable in view of the bar contained in Article 1212 of the Constitution, read with Section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, despite this bar in Article 1212 of the Constitution, the section of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Read with 4, the court had sufficient jurisdiction to instruct public jurisdictions to strictly adhere to Article 4 of the Constitution, while exercising the powers under Article 199 of the Constitution that public officials were obliged to Let them decide to represent their subordinates without fear, kindness, courtesy and justice. The hand should be punished for being a disabled body. Order public workers accordingly immigration advocates contact from Chak Jamal lawyer