Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM


Section 96 The First Appellate Tribunal had fully initiated all the matters involved in the case, presented oral testimony as well as documentary evidence on record in its original context and came to reasonable conclusions, Was not open for trial. , Every aspect of the record matter and documents were discussed and after the conviction or denial, the evidence presented by the parties in the juxtaposition was found by the trial court's findings that they had filed the trial court's order. Exposed defects made by The findings of the record presented by the trial court were in accordance with the evidence, not only according to the record of this case, but also according to the law on the subject, the unwarranted decision was legal, unimaginable and factual. And the circumstances of the case and the appeal for non-interference by the High Court were dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Kabir Wala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.