Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

UMAR DARAZ versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/460 bail, grant of further inquiry was not designated in the FIR Identity Parade, in which case, after the arrest of the accused was mandatory Identity marks were not taken. Unidentified persons accompanying the accused were not mentioned in the FIR proceedings made for the fugitive, they were of a mechanical nature, no recovery was taken from the accused, the complainant and the witnesses Was involved in the suspect and his co-accused was revealed, there was no legal value, as the case was further investigated, the accused was admitted on bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from More kunda lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.