SAIF-UR-REHMAN versus SARFRAZ AHMAD
A. XXXVIII, 5 and 6 adjournment adjudication order before the judgment Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for recovery of money and also demanded the attachment of property before judgment, denying the trial, justifying the trial. Granted, though, the trial court had to ask the defendant to provide security or explain why the security was not offered, but the further clause was that a conditional interim order could be passed during the confrontation. , The High Court directed the trial court to decide the matter pursuant to O XXXVIII, Rr 5 &. 6, the order of the interim attachment was retained by the CPC trial court in which the amendment was disposed of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Machi Goth lawyer
