Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus HAIDER ALI CH

Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 386/342 pre-arrest bail, the changed and revoked version of the accused / respondent was proof of her relationship with the accompanying accused woman. That they both blackmailed 65-year-old complainant, who approached the female suspect in connection with her daughter's proposed marriage, the plaintiff's simple plea for a change of investigation as a reasonable basis for his anticipatory bail. No, the result of the investigation was not a basis for the complainant's satisfaction. For the pre-arrest bail, the Sessions Court observed against the record that there was no evidence that the female co-accused was running the marriage bureau, even before the fact that the accused suspect was a public servant. There was no room. The arrest, rather than its official status, affected his case badly, as it cannot be expected that he was involved in immoral and illegal activities. The FIR had the displeasure of the accepted and recognized standards of public discipline for the alleged conduct of the accused. The specific and definitive allegation was made by the complainant against the accused and the female accompanying accused; any background of the rivalry between the accused parties failed completely before the court. To show that the allegations leveled against Malala's duties were against the record, the sessions court upheld the arrest of the accused on a contrary and serious basis and accordingly dismissed them. immigration advocate from Lalamusa lawyer