Find a Lawyer

ALI AHMAD versus STATE

Testimonies 302 and 364 of the testimony were presented to the trial court in support of the story of the complainant who was the brother of the deceased and his mother in the FIR. Attempts and material points contradict each other on morality. For five days, the witness was also reported to the police as incomprehensible, which invalidated the litigation story that the victim had told the complainant that the accused had returned him to his home serious. Threatened the results or none of the locals were presented to the trial court to prove that the victim was last seen in the company of the prosecution witness who had retired from work, unscrupulous police There was an officer who prosecuted the case. According to the statement of another prosecutor, which was not challenged by the prosecutor, the statement was fully supported by documentary evidence and Dr. Pure's statement after the body was discovered by the prosecution based on fake documents. After the prosecution witnesses and the FIR were recorded, the complainant and his mother were badly declared to be untrustworthy to the extent of the co-accused and their fate was not challenged. The prosecution's witness, who was presented to prove that where the deceased was found dead and the blood stains were collected, was not credible, as he was always with the police. Existed and didn't know where the blood was from. Submitted, otherwise stated property advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer