MUHAMMAD ABBAS ALIAS GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE
Section 497 (2) offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) ordinance, (VII of 1979), sections 10 (3) and bail 11, Grant of further investigation after the abduction of his daughter, grants the matter to the police Although not reported, he knew the names of the culprits The FIR shows that the kidnapper was returned to the complainant, yet the matter was not reported to the police for three days when the case was registered. And the alleged kidnapping was not presented to the investigating officer when his statement was recorded. After more than three weeks, Prima's face believed that the alleged abductor was not ready to support the prosecution's statement in his statement under Section 161, CRPC cleared by the investigating officer. The words said he had entered into a marriage contract with the accused. With the free consent and no one was abducted, the alleged abductor appeared before the magistrate and sought protection after taking his mother at risk. Due to his marriage with the accused, the NTS; and on his request he was lodged in the Darul Aman under the magistrate charges under which further investigation in the section (2) of section 497 against the accused and Inquiries required, CCP suspects were admitted on bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Sanghar lawyer