Find a Lawyer

AZMAT HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE

Two accused, declared as juvenile trial courts, were declared to be tried by the lower trial court, section 302, 324, 148, 149 and 109 of the 7th Penal Code (1860 XLV of 1860). It was alleged that the accused had been ordered. A medical examination was conducted by the Special Medical Board, in which one of the accused was found to be eighteen years old and the other about seventeen years old. Such opinions regarding the ages of the accused were presented by the Medical, Radiological and Dental Special Medical Board. The applicant did not have any material / evidence / evidence to investigate the suspects even to suggest that the opinion of the Special Medical Board regarding the age of the accused was given by the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, Section 7 of 2000 had inaccurate or unreliable provisions, indicating that there was no step. It mentions the age at which an accused was to be investigated for the purpose of declaring him as underage, by the prosecuting attorney's point of view of any legal chronic weakness, point Irregularities of sight, irregularities of procedure or error of reasoning were identified so that the High Court Petition for interim relief could guarantee interference in this matter. , Lost its relevance and was removed immigration advocate from Gari Mori lawyer