Find a Lawyer

KHAN versus STATE

The definition of evidence for the provisions of Sections 5 365A and 34 abductions, the extraordinary delay in filing an FIR, the complete silence about the recovery of the alleged abductors, whether dead or alive, would be less than the penalty for wrongful decision. Did not meet the low standard and the sentence was kept separate and the accused acquitted.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• EMIRATES BANK INTERNATIONAL PJSC v. DIAMOND\'S WORLD, L.L.C. 2014 CLD 1151
• BAKHSHAN v. State 2014 YLR 1151
• Dr. IQBAL JAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2014 PLC(CS) 1153
• LIAQAT ALI SUNANI v. State 2014 MLD 1153
• Mrs. FARAH HAMAYUN SHEHZAD BALOCH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence 2014 CLC 1158
• MARIA v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARACHI 2014 MLD 1158
• MKB ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division (F.B.R.) 2014 PTD 1159
• EHTISHAMULLAH KHAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ZAMAN TOWN, KARACHI 2014 MLD 1171

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

female advocates from Machh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes