ALLAH DIN versus SIRAJ DIN
Sections 302, 149 and 148 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) certify witnesses that there is a contradiction in the dates of police recovery and that the police officer saw and consequently did not rely on the recoveries. Because they are genuinely affected by the alleged party. Ocular testimony was of interest and according to witnesses contradicting the medical evidence, he said that he had excluded all the accused except an independent witness in his investigation, except that one of them No one testified because their conduct was unnatural. And the possibility of their not being excluded could not be excluded as the motive evidence was considered to be of no importance so that the prosecution's case could be taken forward, the charges, the arrests, the circumstances provided the benefit of the doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer