INDRIAS JAUSEPH versus STATE
The mandatory retirement government employee called for the first 7 days to avoid his transfer orders. After the indefinite leave that was granted, he began to seek further leave, but his application was rejected in this regard, the government employee failed to resume duty, and his services were served. He was ordered to appear before the showcase notice and the competent authority, which failed to act due to the overall discipline shown by him, was dismissed from the job but the appellate authority dismissed his dismissal. Compulsory retirement service tribunal changed after retaining compulsory retirement. The government employee failed to state calmly why he did not comply with the transfer order or refused to intervene before the competent authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer