Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL SATTAR versus GHULAM RASOOL


The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in separate pre-discrimination cases, demanded that vendors be excluded from questioning their civil views / writ petitions. Related to payment of. In Siddiq Khan's case, the decision of the Supreme Court was reported as PLD 1984 SC 289 and it was against the vendors / applicants who intended to raise the question of improvement through the petition and the question that In the case of land was not the case, the fact finding against the shopkeepers concluded that no justification was obtained from the facts or otherwise such facts were not allowed to interfere.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Kurram lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.