Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL SATTAR versus GHULAM RASOOL


The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in separate pre-discrimination cases, demanded that vendors be excluded from questioning their civil views / writ petitions. Related to payment of. In Siddiq Khan's case, the decision of the Supreme Court was reported as PLD 1984 SC 289 and it was against the vendors / applicants who intended to raise the question of improvement through the petition and the question that In the case of land was not the case, the fact finding against the shopkeepers concluded that no justification was obtained from the facts or otherwise such facts were not allowed to interfere.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Bhara Kahu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.