RAJ WALI versus STATE
Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 392 bail, refusal of the accused was named in the FIR, the accused was arrested in another case and, during the course of the investigation, found that he was lugging his belongings under section 392. Was responsible for the robbery of the passengers, under the prohibited clause of section 497 against the accused, the PC had sufficient material available to pre-record the accused involved in the alleged defamation offense, to extend the bail to the accused. In the absence of any place for, his request for bail was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer