Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE

Section 302/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 544 Definition of Evidence, In the case of two versions the reduction of both versions is to be juxtaposed to determine which of the two is true or the nearest FI. It is also not listed that the police stations made the remarks made by the prosecution witnesses in the statements made by the witnesses against the accused / appellant. Along with the accused, the thief was stabbed to death with a stolen automotive. Was it that the defendant / appellant committed the murder of the accused in a money dispute, the trial court sentenced the accused and sentenced him to death. The accused claimed that from the very beginning he had requested grave and sudden provocation. That the eyewitnesses were witnesses of the occasion and related to the deceased. That there was a great delay in reporting the matter to the police and that this was not a death sentence. Because the two versions were valid, the two versions had to be intercourse to determine which of these two was true or close. The matter related to the truth was not reported to the police station, but the sub-inspector of the police had met with the complainant at every opportunity to register FI rupees, which were not registered in the police station. During the investigation, the prosecution's witnesses made unambiguous corrections to their statements. According to the medical evidence in relation to the number of injured, bring your statements and the witnesses in that regard have had constant confrontation with their previous statements when the complainant from the time of writing the complaint. list of supreme court advocates from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer