Find a Lawyer

NASIR MAHMOOD versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149/109 bail, the cancellation of the accused was designated regularly in the FIR, with its specific role imposed. Was feared to have suffered a fire arm injury on his back. In the right thigh, which resulted in his death, two innocent people lost their lives and their co-accused was found innocent by local police, but they were later investigated by the crime commission. Was found involved. The Range Crime Sessions Court granted the accused bail on the basis that since he was allowed bail in the complaint case, there is no justification for his denial of bail in the state's case. The one who was to be arraigned and had to be picked up only after the proceedings in the Complaint Case were done, in doing so the Sessions Court was in serious error, as in such cases it was never considered ground for release. Was. In case of prosecution in a private complaint, after the submission of bail bonds by the accused, under the CCP, in the state case, the police case relating to the death penalty under section 497 (2). Bringing the matter to the fore, the CCP was generally released on bail to the accused in a complaint case, but in the attached challan case, his bail was of no avail. The bail granted to the accused accused in the death penalty was withdrawn accordingly immigration advocates email from Haripur lawyer