GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 335/34 Guarantee, List of Further FIR Inquiries, firstly, has revealed that the incident occurred momentarily and that the injunction which was common Was used as The farmers were used by the accused which caused injury to the victim's ear and he was also present in the court and had only a small piece of his ear and the rest of the ear was retained. Was lying Further, the scope of the investigation and fully covered under sub-section (2) of section 497 of the CRPC, the defendants could not be served indefinitely without any useful purpose behind the bars. , The accused was released on bail, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Chakwal lawyer
