Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE

In section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 170, 171, 109, 148 and 149 bail, a further inquiry into the case was noted pending the grant of FIR, in this case the night. There was an incident occurring in the days of. The accused was not named in the FIR, but was involved in the case through the complainant's supplemental statement which was recorded almost one year and two months after the incident, neither the complainant nor Prosecutor's witness identified the accused as a special character, saying the witness's testimony needed further investigation Identification parade was necessary, the identification of the alleged rifle from the forest was not kept at the time of the identification of the accused, in which case Will also require further investigation; Section 497 (2), CRPC is also excluded in case of further investigation into the crime of the accused. The accused was also entitled to bail on the basis of the principle of consistency because his co-accused, whose special name was FIR, as one of the perpetrators of the crime, had already been granted bail. , The suspect was released on bail, under the circumstances best law firm from Padidan lawyer