MUNAWAR KHAN versus AHMAD YAR
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail, the cancellation of counsel for the petitioner / complainant's counsel states that the defendant / accused had committed in court that he had applied on the specific date. Would pay some money and had a chance given to the accused by the court, but the accused did not appear before the court and the accused did not offer any justifiable explanation for not complying with the court order. He was instructed to pay the due date and was already cleared, keeping in view the accused's conduct even before the court charged him with absconding. Deferred bail was canceled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Daud Khel lawyer
