MUHAMMAD ZAHID versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF
The applicant was jailed for about two weeks for the revocation of Section 497 (5), the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337 F (v) / 34 bail, and the fact of his arrest after his arrest. All of them were allowed under the Prohibited Clause of Crimes Section 7497 against the accused, the CC accused was no longer required for investigation, while the Meadow Legal report was obtained days after the incident when the court There can be no discount on orders approved by the bail once the bail was approved. The accused involved in a crime should not be canceled or simply withdrawn as usual and the courts should be slow to cancel or withdraw such privileges unless it is found that the bail is granted. If the order is issued, it will give the accused the right to retain bail. Violation of the guarantee law on this subject. Or was distorted, or the accused misused the exemption so the request for a bail cancellation was rejected without qualification.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer