Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADIR TAWAKKAL versus CHAIRMAN, NAB, ISLAMABAD

Section 1 561 A National Accountability Ordinance (VIVI of 1999 XVIII of 1999) Section 18 With regard to the Court of Accountability, the Superintendent of Jail was denied the release by the applicant claiming that there were three probable references pending against him in the Accountability Court, However, he was never produced before the court, nor was he formally arrested in the aforementioned references. The applicant stated that he did not need a district jail and was entitled to be released from jail. It was alleged that the superintendent had refused to release him on the basis of jail until he was present. A clear-cut order in favor of the applicant, which could not be released, was produced by the applicant's production warrant registrar accountability court for preparation of the applicants in references to the superintendent's jail; Applicants were needed. Submitted before the Accountability Court: But it was not so submitted that the Registrar does not authorize the superintendent of the deck order / letter / warrant issued by the Accountability Court to prevent the applicant from being released from jail. That the production orders were given to the Superintendent Jail only because the applicant had said that he should be registered in jail. As for the trial of some cases in the Accountability Court, as the prisoner stated in the case, the production order cannot be called, nor can be equated to, the arrest of the applicant in pending cases in the Accountability Court. Which had no justification for the superintendent. Release of applicant from jail famous lower court advocate from Raiwind lawyer