KANIZ BIBI versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXVI, R 9 and O XXXIX, RR 1 and 2 Permanent Order for Trial, Temporary Order Prohibition, to find out who has property in this case And the application for the appointment of a local commission to ascertain such request by the appellate court for recording of the parties' evidence by the local commission and seeking report on pending cases / matters from the court hearing. The removal order was issued, the Certified Local Commission could not assume the role of a court. Its jurisdiction was decided only after the court had recorded the evidence itself through the interpretation of the cases / cases which did not identify the case, the trial court relied on a report which was not admitted in the evidence. Was gone and there was no local commission. Such a request was illegally dismissed by the trial court as a witness. In keeping with the order of the appellate court, the High Court dismissed the request for review
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Lalamusa lawyer