IFTIKHAR AKBAR versus STATE
Cannot be used as a tool to effect the recovery of a Section 498 Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), a guarantee before a 489 F arrest, a Section 489 F, a PPC grant, or a financial claim. ? The exclusive jurisdiction of the civil court shall be deemed to be a misuse of the law process, to allow the use of criminal justice justice for the resolution of civil disputes, or to influence the collection of money claimed by a party. Otherwise, the police's aggression and the complainant were not only floating on the surface, but the accused was in the custody of the accused. Was obtained and he had already disclosed the fact that the magistrate, who was the accused's magistrate. Radar's order was also illegally detained, which had to be recovered through the judicial process, and police took action. Despite being a complainant's recovery agent, rather than ordering state employees to comply with the law, it did not appear to be a prohibited provision in section 497, the PC check was already in the custody of the investigating agency and some Was not even The accused received a temporary pre-arrest bail, which was confirmed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kala Bagh lawyer