Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SABIR versus STATE

In the trial court's denial of the order sheet, section 497 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), sections 6, 9 (b) and 51, it was found that after the indictment, the prosecution had to prove its evidence Was instructed to include, but on three occasions the evidence of the prosecution was not available after that there were two witnesses of the prosecution, but their statements could not be recorded on the request of the accused by the accused. The prosecution's witnesses were present on the dates, but their statements could not be recorded as there were pending reasons for various reasons. Saeed's orders from the trial court's accused showed that the accused could not be prosecuted for the delay, while the accused's conduct was also guilty and the request for bail could not be allowed because of the delay. Even after and during the recording phase of the evidence, bail was not generally granted in drug cases. f Controlling the Narcotic Substance Act 1997, bail plea dismissed best advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer