In the interests of the plaintiffs in Articles 42 and 54, a permanent injunction relief case was filed against the defendants and a permanent injunction was filed in which it claimed that it had purchased the suit property under unregistered sale deed, And it was handed over to him. Revenue record could not be included in the property because of the nature of the taxation and income tax records, the plaintiff was recorded because the property owner stated that the plaintiff's title was denied because he was unregistered. Based on the documents claimed ownership, it cannot be taken into account that the two courts below examined the issue of accuracy simultaneously, even though it was unregistered, but its implementation was carried out by a minor witness. It was proved that the utility bills presented by the plaintiff also showed links in the name of the plaintiffs. In the absence of any illegality, simultaneous decisions and orders may not be interfered with, which have been reviewed by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
