NOOR MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) Testimony of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the police had taken the deceased to the hospital; Were. It was revealed that the FIR was not filed when the accused was shown through the prosecution's allegations and his accompanying suspect was the same pistol, no doubt, at the time of his arrest, the accused recovered it. But the firefighter was not able to comment on whether the jacket was fired from the pistol or not ocular testimony of eyewitnesses who were closely related to the victim and hated the accused. , Was not confirmed by any independent evidence, the suspect was acquitted on suspicion. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Sukkur lawyer
