Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANSAR versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention and Control of Human Trafficking Ordinance (LIX of 2002), Sections 2 (h), 3 and 4 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII 1979), Section 22 Bail, Denial of Application for Approval of Bail by Judicial Magistrate, The applicant preferred the appeal before the Court of Appeal, which was dismissed with the observation that the jurisdiction in this case was with the Special Judge (Central), thereby setting forth section 22 of the Immigration Ordinance, 1979. Was taken into account, and in this case it was pointed out that the ingredients were essential ingredients for the prevention of human trafficking and the application of Section 3. The ordinance, 2002, was repression, abduction, abduction, etc. No coercion or use of force was identified in the FIR. My promise or to take anyone outside Pakistan to work abroad would not constitute 'human trafficking' within the meaning of the Prevention Section. ? Controlling the human trafficking ordinance, the Court of Appeal of 2002 found the matter to be exclusively in the jurisdiction of the Special Judge (C). Internal) Submission dismissed, with the observation that the applicant, if advised, could refer to the Special Judge for assistance seeking Judge r \ n Pakistan, top advocate family court from Bagh lawyer