TAUSEEF ALIAS CAPTAIN versus STATE
The accused, who filed the case, &, and the accused, who determined the age of the applicant, who filed a petition by the commission of the court to set aside his case, which was dismissed by the trial court, Applicant filed a revision against such dismissal jurisdiction The trial court, having passed the order, found that the medical board which conducted the applicant's ossication test was not properly constituted. Had foiled his report and the court was required to send the medical superintendent to look into the matter. The Medical Board declared the medical report an essential requirement for determining the age of the applicants in accordance with the provisions of the law; the release of such report, the unclean order, was declared invalid in law and the trial court Was sent to. Renewed for the applicant's age determination
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Daska lawyer
