TARIQ NASEER versus STATE
Section 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Sessions Court, dismissing the order of the accused, was acquitted by the trial court under section 249A, CR PC after the state hearing, which is mandatory under the aforesaid. Was one of the conditions. Delivery of the law session court under an unconstitutional order approved in the review petition, requesting a review of the accused's accuracy against a verdict passed by a judicial magistrate established by the police under section 173 CCPC In one case that was not workable. Although the right to appeal was available under Section 417 (2A) CR PC for the complaint, the unclean order passed by the sessions court was set aside and the application was allowed accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
