Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

TARIQ NASEER versus STATE


Section 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Sessions Court, dismissing the order of the accused, was acquitted by the trial court under section 249A, CR PC after the state hearing, which is mandatory under the aforesaid. Was one of the conditions. Delivery of the law session court under an unconstitutional order approved in the review petition, requesting a review of the accused's accuracy against a verdict passed by a judicial magistrate established by the police under section 173 CCPC In one case that was not workable. Although the right to appeal was available under Section 417 (2A) CR PC for the complaint, the unclean order passed by the sessions court was set aside and the application was allowed accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Killa Abdullah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.