Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI ALIAS GAMI versus STATE

Section 302 (b) evidence was appreciated at ten o'clock in the dark hours of the night and was initially lodged with the FIR after a delay of five hours on the complainant's statement, the victim's father lodged a complaint. About three months after the incident of a private complaint against the accused, the complainant and his son had submitted a regular account of the incident and both of them had committed dishonest improvement before the trial. The injuries were not mentioned. Either in the complaint or in their statements, the purpose of the trial court against the accused could not be proved by the prosecution. Evidence related to the recovery of the gun was assisted by the accused and the eyewitnesses were not present at the incident. They were assessing the attacker and adjusting their statements according to new disclosures. The e-prosecution case was filled with suspicion. The accused was acquitted. when you need a advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer