Find a Lawyer

MST. NARGIS KHALIDA ALIAS KHALIDA NARGIS versus BASHIR AHMAD

In the first cases for the acquisition of stability through the specific performance of the contract against Section 12 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), section 23 public policy, the parties agree to bear the costs of litigation together. After the success of the judgment in the first cases, the defendant refused to pay part of his agreement after the successful trial, and the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff but The appellate court rejected it on the ground that it was against the agreement. The legality of public policy Not every contract for litigation is a liability for public policy, it can be a case in which it is necessary to resist law, equality, justice and oppression, such as a lawsuit that The title of the property is fair and complete but there is no way to recover it, therefore, in such a situation the agreement will be legal and valid. Such agreements must be carefully scrutinized and when irresponsible, unjust or unfair. For the right or wrong thing or to be the law or the repressive or commendable litigation. On the contrary, there would be a similar attack on public policy violations. , The unfair or ineligible appellate court not only misused the law but also ignored the material evidence, but the judgment and judgment passed by the appellate court were set aside and ordered to prosecute in favor of the plaintiff. r \ n inheritance advocates near Shorkot lawyer