Find a Lawyer

LT.-COL. (R.) MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY (DHA) THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR

Article 199 (3) Cancellation of plots monitored by constitutional petition The allotted plots to the applicants were canceled by the authorities in 1996, a decision which was immediately conveyed to them, the applicants filed the cancellation in the year 2007. Order was verified There were intact and indirect challenges to these orders, which were neither valid nor valid due to illegal / unidentified bribes after the expiry of approximately 12 12 years, and no decision on cancellation orders. This could have been done because these people had already been finalized and the applicants were also processed. The decrees that were adopted a decade ago and challenged by Article 199 (3) of the Constitution, although not binding, were still in place to file a petition for interference. Were unsuccessful. The lack of jurisdiction, the abuse of jurisdiction over the PA, or the misconduct has nothing to do with the competent authority of the High Court, nor does it go off the record. The constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances family advocate from Hayatabad lawyer