Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ versus STATE

Sections 1 30 30 and b 302 (b) At the time of the presentation of the evidence, the presence of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses arose from the fact that the complainant's statement was promptly recorded within thirty-five minutes, both of the prosecution The witnesses made a permanent, coherent, natural, and credible confession because of the incident witnesses testified to each other on all material points The internal treatment of the witnesses could not be examined during their inspection. As evidence was backed by medical evidence, the two suspects were arrested shortly after the incident and recovered their weapons. had gone. Killed in an extensive day, including a high-ranking officer, the prosecution also proved the motive for success was that the prosecutor successfully proved his case through an ocular account against two cases, which were medically Was supported by evidence and fully confirmed by circumstantial evidence, such as cases such as arrest of the accused. On the same day, F's residence IR carried out an immediate, immediate post-mortem inspection at the corps, recovery of weapons and their connection to the vacant matter. Both defendants pleaded guilty to the murder of two innocent people on Wednesday. There is no mitigating circumstance in favor of inheritance. The driver, however, compromised with the accused, which was accepted under the High Court order, both of the defendants were acquitted on the charge of killing the deceased driver and his death sentence was not confirmed and his The extent of death was answered negatively. Two accused convicted of murder of third suspect when you need a advocate from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer