DR. SHAGUFTA SHAHJEHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Article 199 (b) (ii) Environmental Protection Department Punjab Service Rules, 1997 Constitution Petition While relaxing the rules of appointment of Virento, scope of complaint, petitioner's complaint was that the defendant was the Director General in the Department of Environmental Protection. Was appointed to the post. The Environmental Protection Department relaxed the Punjab Service Rules in 1997, as it did not have the requisite qualifications by the applicants; the request was that the eligibility requirement for appointment of Director General was banned, Environmental Protection and Environment Department. I was a PhD in Punjab. An engineering respondent with seven years of experience in the management of pollution control projects, had neither the required qualifications nor experience, the appointment of the defendant was declared invalid and the government appointed the defendant. The operation was declared without legal authority. The ONTANT failed to show that it had vacated the office of the Director General Environmental Protection Agency of Punjab, who had vacated the office of the Director General Environmental Protection Agency, Punjab, due to the illegal and unlawful appointment of the defendant in public office under the authority of the law. Disqualification was assigned to this position in violation of the policy. The individual and his public office were not attracted to the application of unqualified principles under which a petition was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
