Section 497 (2) Narcotic Substance Act (XVV of 1997), Section 9 (C) and 51 bail, the grant of further investigative records, proved that the case against the accused was a result of bad luck. Was also involved in another criminal case. He was not named accused in the case, the accused were arrested in this case, but they were admitted on bail and the court clearly stated this while deciding the bail application in the case. That a case was registered against the accused in this case. The case was without FIR numbers and the alleged recovery did not affect the report of any of the accused persons and the four were seized from the premises and no accused was arrested on the spot. I was not going to raise the law of legitimacy. The right to prosecution and bail could not be barred as punishment because taking advantage of the doubt, if any, could also be granted at the bail-out stage, the accused was considered innocent until he was found guilty outside the court. Don't prove it. Despite the barriers contained in section 551 of the Code of Conduct Act 1997 under the jurisdiction, the prosecution can easily grant bail to the accused Prima, who is available to reasonably believe that the accused The offense under section 497 is a matter of further investigation. (2), CCP suspects were released on bail, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
