SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE
Section 302 (b) failed to establish the prosecution for the benefit of the doubt beyond the definition of evidence and did not file an FIR at the time of the incident and at the police station and after the discussion and preliminary investigation, it was filed at the same place. can go. Eyewitnesses not only had a deep connection with the deceased, but even on the occasion of confession, the presence of eyewitnesses was so suspicious that their statements could not be relied on wholeheartedly, which was not available independently. Established by prosecution, it was not proved that the recovery of the pistol from the accused's possession was legally unforgettable as no vacancies were recovered from any place to link it to the crime. The complainant party's conduct was indicated to include evidence related to the hatching of the conspiracy, the ability to make false accusations against innocent persons on the day's events and the facts of the case of the same named accused Will not support the prosecution's case in the face of the allegation that he has the benefit of the doubt Yes, they were acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Dadakhel lawyer