Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

The applicant / suspect was allegedly armed with an iron rod at the time of execution of the Section 426 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 452/34, but the injury attributed to him was a sharp weapon. Was the one who clearly showed the bead. Nevertheless, the trial court itself found that litigation between litigation and litigation was not a fatal appeal related to the petitioner's 2006 and there was no central appeal hearing at the close. It was not possible. In the future the request for a suspension of sentence was allowed and the sentence given to the applicant was suspended best advocate from Attock lawyer